Lifestyle Business vs Equity Business
When I did a search for “lifestyle business” I found some interesting posts discussing the term. It seems that this is something of a swear word thrown at businesses that aren’t considered “real businesses”. They describe the connotations surrounding the term as indicating that these are not real businesses, especially in the venture capital community. An “equity business” is viewed as something that is worth of investing in because the long term growth prospects are considerable, even if short term profit is extremely unlikely.
The way I see lifestyle business is as a means to create leverage for oneself. Looking at someone like Timothy Ferriss from the Four Hour Work Week for example, you see that building a lifestyle business is a great way to create a cash cow that can fund either your grander business aspirations, or it can fund your lifestyle.
The main thing I see separating a lifestyle business from an equity business is that a lifestyle business needs to be profitable very early on. If we don’t have a plan to profit from our very first customers/visitors, then it’s not worthwhile trying. In an equity business we’re more interested in growth of our customer base, in establishing critical mass and market share, then we go looking for a way to tweak things in order to reach profitability. The equity business tactics are certainly much higher risk, but also higher rewards.
I think the term “lifestyle business” is inaccurate. Of course we can provide ourselves with a comfortable lifestyle from this type of business, but I believe a better term would be cash cow. This term also provides something of a shift in our mindset when we look at it this way. Lifestyle business has connotations of sitting back and relaxing, whereas cash cow reminds us that the business is used to fund other activities within our larger operations. For example, we could look at PlentyOfFish.com and say that it is a lifestyle business, but I’m willing to bet that the owner/operator Markus Frind would look at things differently. Sure he can run his site in minutes per day (allegedly), but if you’re generating in excess of $10 million in revenue annually from such a minimal amount of work, you have a lot of options. These numbers are of course unrealistic for most of these types of businesses, but it shows the upside potential.
By applying this type of mentality to the online media business, my plan is to develop a small number of so called lifestyle businesses online. Then I will use the proceeds from these to build something focused more on equity, on building a large user base in spite of no plans for short term profitability. Sure you could do up your business plan, create a few prototypes and go the venture capital route, but then you hand over all control and a huge piece of the pie. Perhaps this is why the VCs look on these “lifestyle businesses” with such disdain, because it shows that they aren’t needed. I’m not saying that VCs are a bad thing, just that they aren’t the only choice if you want to build something big in online media.